|
A few articles
to read together:
Source:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120428023327/http://economyincrisis.org/content/illegal-immigration-and-nafta
Illegal
Immigration and NAFTA
February 05,
2011
Dustin Ensinger
One of the largely overlooked aspects of the North American Free Trade
Agreement is the fact that the failed trade pact has been the catalyst
for the massive increase in illegal immigration over the past two
decades or so.
An influx of highly subsidized corn flooding the Mexican market has
displaced millions of rural farmers, according to McClatchy Newspapers.
Prior to the implementation of NAFTA, Mexican officials claimed that
factory jobs would fill the void left by disappearing work on family
farms.
Mexican officials had promised that NAFTA would result in the “export
of goods, not people.” That, however, has turned out to be far from
reality.
Since NAFTA was signed into law, illegal immigrants in the U.S. has
increased to 12 million today from 3.9 million in 1993, accounting for
an overall increase of over 300 percent. According to the Pew Hispanic
Center, 57 percent of those entering the country illegally are from
Mexico.
“The numbers of people displaced from family farming were much, much
higher than the number of new wage jobs,” Jonathan Fox, an expert on
rural Mexico at the University of California at Santa Cruz, told
McClatchy Newspapers.
Those displaced workers are largely the result of U.S. corn exports to
Mexico. Heavily subsidized American Agribusiness not only put hundreds
of thousands of American family farms out of business, but also dumped
billions of dollars worth of American agricultural products into the
Mexican market, putting millions of peasant farmers out of business.
Between 1994 and 2001, the flood of cheap, subsidized American corn
caused the price of the crop to fall 70 percent in Mexico. The drop in
prices caused millions of farm jobs to disappear, with the numbers
falling from 8.1 million in 1993 to 6.8 million in 2002.
Those out-of-work farmers make up the bulk of the illegal immigrants
entering the U.S. each year. Unable to compete with their highly
subsidized American competitors – $10 billion in 2000 alone – rural
Mexican farmers have increasingly sought employment in the U.S.
Corn producing jobs – the nation’s largest cash crop – fell by over one
million in the first decade of NAFTA. Additionally, another 142,000 job
cultivating flowers and fruit have disappeared.
In rural areas, the percentage of the population working in the
agricultural sector fell from 44 percent in the early 1990s to just 28
percent at the beginning of the decade.
Even those that did not earn livings on farms were likely to be
affected by NAFTA. Since the trade pact was implemented, 30,000 small
and medium-sized businesses have permanently closed their doors.
“It’s been roughly a tripling, quadrupling, quintupling of U.S. corn
exports to Mexico, depending on the year,” Timothy A. Wise, the
director of research and policy at the Global Development and
Environment Institute at Tufts University in Medford, Mass, told
McClatchy Newspapers. “Is that a river? Yeah, that’s a lot of corn.”
The end result has been a flood of illegal immigration into the U.S.
With jobs drying up in Mexico, millions have illegally crossed the
border seeking work. If it were not for NAFTA, illegal immigration
would not be such a problem.
“The great failure of this supposition is that there wasn’t economic
growth that would absorb these people,” Victor Suarez, the executive
director of the National Association of Rural Producers, told
McClatchy. “The result has left rural areas increasingly populated by
the elderly and women.”
“In Chiapas, there was hardly any migration before NAFTA,” Suarez said,
referring to Mexico’s southernmost state. “Farm laborers were even
brought in from Guatemala. Now, more than 50,000 rural people from
Chiapas go each year to the United States.”
Excerpts from these two articles, put together:
http://www.jta.org/1993/11/16/archive/trade-deal-holds-different-appeal-for-jews-north-and-south-of-border
http://www.jta.org/1993/11/18/archive/the-jews-of-mexico-mexican-president-courts-jews-in-attempt-to-inluence-u-s-bill
The Jewish
community of Mexico, centered in Mexico City, is estimated to number
just 50,000, out of a population of some 88 million.
The Jewish angle in all this rests on a naive but firmly held
equation: Mexico’s Jews are closely linked to their brethren in the
United States, who are believed to influence American government and
society. Therefore, the wisdom holds, if Mexico’s Jews can win over
American Jews, the NAFTA deal is as good as done.
In addition, while not all agree, some in the Mexican Jewish
community think NAFTA would encourage further political modernization
in Mexico, and thus would create a more tolerant atmosphere for
minorities.
“In a pluralistic society, there would be more space” to
legitimize “Jewish identity and Jewish belonging,” said Bokser-Liwerant.
There is a close relation between “an open market and an open
society,” she said.
Mexican Jews also have said they would welcome the closer
ties to the United States that the agreement would bring, in part
because of the close ties between the United States and Israel.
If NAFTA fails, it is possible that a “nationalistic
reaction” could emerge in Mexico that would not help the country move
toward “diversity, pluralism, and tolerance,” Bokser-Liwerant said.
Summary:
50,000 Jewish people in Mexico convincing 2% of the population in the
U.S. that something needs to be done -- and what they want done is a
done deal, millions of Mexican farmers are displaced, America loses her
control of her borders, Americans are forced to compete with cheap
labor from other countries, etc. Fascinating.
I love that "who are believed to influence American government and
society" bit. If I were to say that, I'd be accused of throwing out
"age-old antisemitic canards." The Jewish Telegraphic Agency can say it
and get away with it, but just don't quote them!
|
|